i am teacher. i am learner.

"turnitoffandonagain" - when ICT goes wrong and makes you mad

New term, New Technologies plan, new staff, new enthusiasm to drive the effective use of ICT for learning forward. All hampered by the same old ICT issues, provided courtesy of our 'managed service'. As we start our fifth week in, the vast majority of confidence in our system has dried up, staff goodwill for taking a tentative step towards an ICT-rich year of learning has disappeared, and my own personal exasperation with the poorly managed service has reached a critical level.

I've been labelled as the school's 'ICT evangelist' by the Head, but share the same level of frustration that our staff have yet to embrace the opportunities afforded by effective and creative use of ICT for learning. Sitting underneath the school's three-year Strategic Development Plan and comfortably alongside the Community Cohesion plan is the New Technologies plan. The very first point of action stated in the plan was to ensure that all staff and students could access the existing system. Pretty straightforward, considering the fact that new academic years have been happening for some time now. This is the fourth new academic year that our service has been managed for us: the first was chaotic, the second not much better, the third successfully undid a year's worth of staff enthusiasm in the space of a month. So strategic meetings were held, processes and timescales agreed, appropriate levels of importance attached to each task - all to ensure that the start of this academic year ran smoothly, all to ensure that the school could focus on its core business of learning, secure in the knowledge that the managed service was there to provide a wide range of tools to enhance our efforts. Alas, it wasn't to be.

It didn't make us feel any better to hear that all the other local schools with the same managed service provider were experiencing the same unacceptably wide range of issues, essentially rendering core ICT functions useless: no Internet, can't print, work lost from the VLE, email not working, can't access the network, system slow...

And then Ofsted came to visit, so we had a few extra resources thrown at the school to paper over the cracks, but this didn't succeed in ensuring that our network was stable [it crashed at the start of a lesson, midway through Ofsted's first day, causing untold stress and misery to those being observed, and utter frustration to those who just wanted to get on with using ICT in their lessons]. Tempers frayed. Not much moved forward. All simply unsatisfactory.

We recently met with our managed service providers, to agree what needed to be done about the pickle we find ourselves in. Buoyed by the excellent support of our local authority prior to and during the meeting, and thanks to the representatives from the managed service provider being aligned to our demand for making significant changes to their current practice, we left the meeting with a sense of optimism: a feeling that the immediate quick wins would go some way to helping re-engage with staff; and that the agreed overhaul of key systems and processes would result in a service that was fit for purpose.

Throughout the meeting, I insisted on bringing the conversations back to the basics, back to the simple fact that our learners were the losers in this. Every time, after every glitch. As my colleague correctly pointed out, in teaching every second counts: if you lose part of a lesson due to the ICT tripping over itself, you cannot ever win it back. You cannot politely request that exam boards postpone exams until you've caught up the bits you lost. You cannot recommend that lunch starts twenty minutes later today, to make up for the fact that no-one could log-on to the system for the first part of the lesson. I described this impact as playing with people's lives.

But out of all this is a sliver of a silver-lining, which underlines for me the sheer excellence of teachers: everyone has been finding workarounds and creative solutions and ways to get things done, so as to minimise the negative impact on lessons, and maximise opportunities for learning. Colleagues retain some element of faith with the system.

Sadly, the cloud remains, and the two areas where our managed ICT has simply failed are the very areas that form the central thrust to the New Technologies plan: ensuring a positive impact on learning and developing staff capacity to use ICT effectively. So what are the next steps? I see two phases to resurrecting our engagement with ICT, which will then enable the school to begin working strategically through the New Technologies plan:

Phase One focuses on re-launching/publicising/showcasing with staff the wide range of ICT tools they have at their disposal. The network is reasonably stable now, and all users can finally access it in its entirety. Phase One is just about shining a big light on the wonderful potential we have. A series of focused training/experience sessions, offering answers to the question, "What do you want the ICT to do for you?". This has to happen over the next two-to-three weeks. We have already been too long without appropriate provision.

This will lead into Phase Two, which is agreeing common expectations across all curriculum areas - whether through posting homelearning tasks on the VLE for parents and carers to access, or sharing resources with students using social bookmarking. Phase Two is critical in that it requires sufficient buy-in from key staff, and demands an excellent level of support and training to empower colleagues to engage with ICT and embed it sufficiently in their practice.

And the [postponed] future? To badly quote Buzz Lightyear, "to infinity and beyond, and the New Technologies plan".

Respect: an assembly with a simple message

Another term, another assembly, another prezi.

I wanted to deliver a clear message about 'Respect' to my students and challenge them to walk out of the assembly ready to do something new. I've enjoyed delivering assemblies using prezi. An interesting [and positive!] difference it has made to my delivery style is the simple fact that I am not bound to a set of printed-out powerpoint prompt pages, which prevents me from hiding behind notes. I have to deliver more freely, and enjoy the mobility: it allows me to be more like me, and this allows me more opportunities to engage with the assembled students. Simply put, the potential for impact is greatly increased.

I managed to squeeze in my [now obligatory] reference to Twitter, this time sharing some of the tweets I received in response to a request about how my network defined respect in schools. This helped me open students' minds to the fact that there is a big wide world outside of the school gates, and some of the people in it are odd teacher-types like me.

There are a couple of bits in the presentation to iron out, but such is the scheduling of our assembly rota, that I have the opportunity to do it all again next week [complete with added improvements].

It is always pleasing to receive positive feedback from staff and students after assemblies, and today was no exception. Which was nice.

Here's the prezi [rough and ready]. What do you think?

 

 

Ideas for social learning

So, I've been reading with interest the blogs, ideas, questions and discussions that many people have been engaged in about embracing new technologies, bringing them into the classroom and making web 2.0 work for learning. From hashtag discussions via Twitter, to browsing blogs, to social-bookmarking, to some quite stupendous prezis, to projects conducted through Flickr, I've come to realise that the way I am learning about learning has changed. Could I bring this shift into my classroom? Of course! The challenge is to focus on the learning potential of social-networks, and to secure the buy-in of school leadership, LAs and parents.

Unfortunately, too much emphasis is placed on two key aspects of social media, both of which prevent important next steps being taken:

  1. The incorrect assumption by teachers that teachers cannot make effective use of social media "because the children are so much better at it". Granted, the young people I teach demonstrate an ease with technology, confidently making it work for them. My issue remains that they still need to be taught how to make it work for their learning. Many learners in my school still search for everything via google [and I mean everything - they'll even type a web address into the google search bar instead of the browser address bar!]. If they knew how to make best use of the alternatives, the quality of their learning experience would be greatly enhanced! Our lessons are beginning to open up the idea of collaboration, group independence, but the desire for important content and skills to come from the teacher at the front of the class still prevails.
  2. The risk-averse approach maintained in schools and LAs that is selling social-networking as something to avoid for fear of losing control over all aspects of your life. The point of learning is so that we are able to adapt to new situations, using a set of skills which allow us to move forward. So why aren't we learning enough about web 2.0 in schools? Why aren't teachers being encouraged to learn about its potential?

What to do about it?

Getting other key staff interested and involved is the challenge. I am determined to share with my colleagues the advantages of social media by getting them using it. Prezis at assemblies and shared in meetings is an easy first step, already getting people talking about alternative ways to record and share their learning.

Explaining use of Twitter for educational purposes is my next approach with leadership. Recent networking via ukedchat and the vast array of ideas, support, links and resources is an excellent starting point - it should be an easy sell to anyone interested in developing their learning skills. The outcomes and summaries from the discussions make for engaging reading.

Within my MFL teaching, I'm currently looking at developing social bookmarking [using delicious] as we approach the start of the new academic year, for staff as well as students. It's so easy to use, it ought to be a no-brainer! Fingers crossed.

Sir Ken Robinson

What education-related blog would be complete without a reference to Sir Ken Robinson's recent TED Talk about revolutionising our school systems?

 

 

A three-year-old is not half a six-year-old

This particular quote resonates with my thinking about our need to move away from linear learning.

As a colleague recently asked, how do we make this happen?

In brief, embracing the ways in which new technologies bring people more easily in touch with one another, allowing these technologies to enter our classrooms, teaching our learners the power of effectively using them - that's how we can make a start.

Filed under: learning sir ken robinson

Assembly think-piece: science-fiction or science-fact

I recently delivered a whole-school assembly, and wanted to challenge my audience to think about how technology is evolving and where it could lead. Thought I'd share my prezi with you. Science-fiction or science-fact is an immense topic, so I focused on a couple of ideas, intending to reflect current news themes. I'm thinking about delivering my next assembly on how we need to learn how to (re)search effectively, pulling students away from lazy 'googling' to more targetted searches. Now just the small fact of making it enthralling!

 

[N.B. the first video clip is there, because it was a Monday morning assembly, and I wanted something to engage students' minds quickly!]

 

 

Twitter for networking. Nice.

I've been using Twitter for about a year. Took me a while to get into it, but now I'm fully sold on the idea of its immediacy and potential for finding similarly-minded professionals, and sharing thoughts on a range of topics.

I was recently involved in a Twitter-discussion led by Sir Ken Robinson. He'd publicised the fact that he would be online at a certain time, and then, once he 'appeared', all hell broke loose! He posted a few links to some interesting thinkpieces, asked some incisive questions and responded to those of us there who were totally engaged in the thread of the discussion. The hour that he was online zipped by so quickly, and so much was shared by so many - it was a truly powerful experience.

For me there were two beneficial outcomes:

Firstly, when I eventually turned off my computer and sloped off to bed, I had a head full of some key ideas and questions that I have begun to share with colleagues in school.

Secondly, there were a few 'stand-out' contributors to the discussion, whose ideas really resonated with mine. I chose to follow them on Twitter, and have since discovered a goldmine of ideas, resources, presentations, deep questions. And the supply seems endless!

There is real power in the meeting of minds, and the aftermath ensures that the energy doesn't wane. Even now, almost a week after the discussion, people are still posting their thoughts on the issues raised. And by using a simple search, I can read them, follow their links, be challenged by their points of view.

Interested in what Sir Ken Robinson has to say? Visit www.twitter.com/sirkenrobinson

If you want to follow the thread of the discussion that he was part of last week, use the search term 'artsed'. This will bring up all tweets with that tag.

The potential for all of us as learners is huge!

Just wanted to add a footnote to my post. I've just enjoyed 45 mins of sharing ideas about technology in education via a Twitter discussion (#edchat). Found a brief but interesting article challenging perceptions of Twitter. Read it here

11
To Posterous, Love Metalab